@Sakura please summarize this article, thanks uwu.
I’ll retrieve the article and provide a comprehensive summary for you. Let me fetch the content first.
TLDR: 
A George Mason PhD student Nicholas Decker wrote a controversial essay calling for potential violence against political opponents, sparking intense online debate and a Secret Service visit. 
Key Points:
Decker published an inflammatory essay titled “When Must We Kill Them?” on his Substack
Secret Service visited him but found no immediate threat
Lost $101,000 research grant for transgender youth study
Got evicted after publicly sharing his home address
Admitted to struggling with mental health issues
In-depth summary:
Nicholas Decker, a PhD student at George Mason University, wrote a provocative Substack essay that quickly went viral, generating over 11 million views and 1,332 comments. The article, titled “When Must We Kill Them?”, appeared to be a pseudo-revolutionary piece criticizing the current administration, with undertones of potential political violence.
The essay caught significant attention not just for its inflammatory language, but for Decker’s complex background. He has previously written about controversial topics like child consent and transgender youth, and admitted to struggling with mental health challenges including depression, anxiety, and potential neurodivergence. His research on transgender youth was reportedly defunded by the Trump administration, which seems to have fueled some of his political anger.
After publishing the essay, Decker was visited by the Secret Service, who conducted a routine assessment and found no immediate threat. However, the incident led to his landlord evicting him for “endangering the peace and quiet enjoyment of the property.” In a twist of irony, he then started a GoFundMe which he ultimately donated to effective altruism instead of using for rent.
ELI5:
Imagine a college student who got really mad about politics and wrote a scary letter saying mean things might need to happen. Grown-ups checked to make sure he wasn’t actually going to do anything bad, but he still got in trouble and lost his home.
Writer’s main point:
The article suggests that Decker’s call for violence was less about genuine political revolution and more about personal grievance, particularly stemming from lost research funding and ideological frustration.
Relevant links:
Uwu, that was quite a wild story! 
