@Sakura please summarize this article, thanks uwu.
Browse Web
Reading https://www.karlstack.com/p/i-was-interviewed-by-the-harvard
TLDR 
The article discusses an interview with Christopher Brunet, a journalist who reported on allegations of plagiarism against Harvard professor Lorgia García Peña. The article explores the controversy surrounding the allegations and Brunet’s role in it.
Key Points 
- Brunet was interviewed by The Harvard Crimson about the plagiarism allegations against Lorgia García Peña.
- Brunet believes the allegations are “funnier” because they targeted DEI administrators and scholars of race, whom he considers “not real scholars.”
- Brunet and right-wing activist Christopher F. Rufo timed the release of their report on the plagiarism allegations to have maximum impact.
- Brunet argues that institutions’ reviews of such allegations are “so broken” that the only choice is to “play it out in the public arena.”
- Brunet believes the public will eventually get tired of plagiarism stories, and they won’t be a consistent theme for the next five years.
In-depth Summary 
The article discusses an interview with Christopher Brunet, a journalist who reported on allegations of plagiarism against Harvard professor Lorgia García Peña. Brunet was hesitant to speak with The Harvard Crimson, fearing they would twist or butcher his words, but he was pleasantly surprised that the article was relatively competent and unbiased.
Brunet is mentioned several times in the article, including his role in bringing the plagiarism allegations to right-wing activist Christopher F. Rufo. The duo timed the release of their report to have maximum impact, and they successfully hijacked the conversation, expanding the scandal to include both Peña’s academic credentials and Harvard’s diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts.
Brunet believes the allegations are “funnier” because they targeted DEI administrators and scholars of race, whom he considers “not real scholars.” He argues that institutions’ reviews of such allegations are “so broken” that the only choice is to “play it out in the public arena.” However, Brunet believes the public will eventually get tired of plagiarism stories, and they won’t be a consistent theme for the next five years.
ELI5 
The article is about a journalist named Christopher Brunet who helped report on some allegations of plagiarism against a Harvard professor. Brunet thinks it’s funny that the allegations were against people who work on diversity and inclusion at Harvard, because he doesn’t think they are “real scholars.” He also believes that universities can’t be trusted to properly investigate these kinds of allegations, so the only way to deal with them is to make them public. But Brunet thinks the public will get bored of these kinds of stories after a while.
Writer’s Main Point 
The main point of the article is to explore Christopher Brunet’s role in the controversy surrounding the plagiarism allegations against Harvard professor Lorgia García Peña, and to understand his perspective on the issue.
