@Sakura please summarize this article, thanks uwu.
TLDR
MIT has become the first elite university to eliminate mandatory diversity statements in faculty hiring, and has also revealed a significant drop in Black and Hispanic student enrollment after the Supreme Court’s affirmative action ruling. Meanwhile, several academic scandals and lawsuits involving professors at Harvard and Yale have come to light.
Key Points
MIT eliminated mandatory diversity statements in faculty hiring, becoming the first elite university to do so.
MIT’s Black and Hispanic student enrollment dropped sharply after the Supreme Court’s affirmative action ruling.
Several academic scandals and lawsuits involving professors at Harvard and Yale have emerged, including issues with tenure denials and research misconduct.
Repeat offenders like economists Nunn and Giuliano have faced scrutiny over papers that failed to replicate.
In-depth Summary
The article discusses several recent developments in the academic world, starting with MIT’s decision to become the first elite university to eliminate mandatory diversity statements in faculty hiring. This move has been praised by some as a victory for academic freedom, while others have criticized it as a setback for diversity and inclusion efforts.
The article then delves into the impact of the Supreme Court’s affirmative action ruling, which has led to a significant drop in Black and Hispanic student enrollment at MIT. The university’s decision to publicly reveal these demographic changes has sparked further debate around the role of affirmative action in higher education.
The article also covers a number of academic scandals and lawsuits involving professors at prestigious institutions like Harvard and Yale. These include a high-profile case of a former Harvard economics professor, Ben Edelman, who is suing the university over the denial of his tenure, as well as the ongoing saga of a Harvard Business School professor, Marco Di Maggio, who was involved in a massive criminal fraud.
Additionally, the article shines a light on the issues surrounding the work of economists Nunn and Giuliano, whose influential research papers have been called into question due to replication failures and allegations of sloppy or even fraudulent practices.
Throughout the article, the author weaves in a sense of frustration with the apparent lack of accountability and consequences for these academic misdeeds, drawing parallels to the Catholic Church’s handling of its own scandals.
ELI5
This article talks about some big changes and problems happening at top universities. First, MIT decided to stop requiring professors to write about their commitment to diversity when applying for jobs. This was seen as a win for some, but a loss for others who think diversity is important.
Then, after the Supreme Court made a big decision about affirmative action, MIT’s numbers showed a big drop in Black and Hispanic students getting into the school. This caused a lot of debate about whether affirmative action is a good thing or not.
The article also talks about some professors who got into trouble at places like Harvard and Yale. One professor sued Harvard for not giving him tenure, and another professor from Harvard Business School was involved in a big crime that hurt a lot of people.
The article also talks about two famous economists, Nunn and Giuliano, whose research papers were found to have a lot of mistakes in them. This made people question whether their work can be trusted.
Overall, the article shows that there are a lot of problems and scandals happening in the world of top universities, and it’s making people wonder if these places are really as great as they’re supposed to be.
Writer’s Main Point
The main point the writer is trying to make is that there is a concerning lack of accountability and consequences for academic misconduct and scandals at elite universities. The author draws parallels to how the Catholic Church handled its own scandals, suggesting that problematic professors are often simply shuffled off to other institutions rather than being properly held responsible.
The writer seems particularly frustrated by the cases of Nunn and Giuliano, whose high-profile research papers have been debunked but who have faced minimal repercussions. The author argues that this undermines the credibility of academic work and the institutions that enable such behavior.
Overall, the article paints a picture of an academic system that is rife with corruption, personal vendettas, and a culture of protecting its own, even in the face of clear ethical and professional breaches.